Anna Delvey, the infamous “Soho Grifter” who conned New York’s elite by posing as a wealthy German heiress, made a brief but highly controversial appearance on Dancing with the Stars, only to be voted off in the first week. Her stint on the show, though short-lived, raised significant ethical questions. Delvey, born Anna Sorokin, emerged in pop culture after her trial and Netflix series Inventing Anna, yet her crimes were deeply rooted in deceit, financial fraud, and, arguably, an art of manipulation that fits neatly into the realm of modern art crime.
Her appearance on a show that celebrates glamour and personal transformation, without acknowledgement of the consequences of her fraud brings up a larger conversation about the ethics of profiting from crime and fame. Is it morally acceptable for someone who defrauded art galleries, hotels, and high-society figures to now use that notoriety to rebuild her image? More so, can Delvey’s life be considered a form of performance art in itself? Her scams, after all, were not unlike an elaborate art performance. Delvey crafted an entire persona that fit neatly into the art world’s obsession with exclusivity, wealth, and prestige, having fabricated her background and financial status to blend into high society.
Now that she’s been voted off in the first round, the ethical dilemma surrounding her appearance becomes even more obvious. Did her quick exit show that audiences were uncomfortable with rewarding someone who profited off deception, or was she simply not as captivating on the dance floor as she was in her court appearances?
The ethics of her going on Dancing with the Stars get murkier when considering the glorification of criminals like Delvey in the media. Much like high-profile art criminals who achieve a certain level of fame —graffiti artist, Banksy for example— she is now able to capitalize on the narrative she created. But does featuring her on a mainstream TV show romanticize her crimes, treating her as a misunderstood anti-hero rather than someone who harmed individuals and institutions?
Moreover, her appearance raises questions about how art crimes, and crimes in general, are commodified in entertainment. True crime stories, whether about art thefts or financial frauds, captivate audiences. But unlike cases where criminals are caught and serve their sentences with quiet rehabilitation, Delvey’s presence on a platform like Dancing with the Stars blurs the line between accountability and reward. Her newfound fame seemingly is a clever extension of her con artistry, transforming notoriety into a form of celebrity.
In many ways, Delvey’s rise to fame mirrors how art crime is romanticized by the media and public. Delvey’s fraud has been reframed as a cunning performance, a sort of artistic rebellion against a superficial, capitalistic society. In creating a celebrity out of her, we risk elevating the criminal aspect to an art form itself, detaching the crime from its real-world consequences.
Should someone who forged not only documents but also her entire persona now be allowed to take the stage for applause?
I thought that this article was very interesting and insightful when it comes to the idea of crime being used for profit in entertainment. You write that “her [Delvey] appearance raises questions about how art crimes, and crimes in general, are commodified in entertainment” and I completely agree. I also think that this case is representative of a broader trend in media entertainment today. There are other examples of streaming services like Netflix creating series about criminals, moving away from a factual documentary style to historical fiction that often confuses the viewer by painting the criminals in a different light. This was also the case for Anna Delvey herself who was the focal point of the hit Netflix series “Inventing Anna” which made her out to be some genius mastermind con woman. In bringing her story to the spotlight and presenting her character and story the way that the series did, Netflix profited off of her story and in turn brought her tremendous fame. In my opinion, it was this fame that earned her a spot in the popular dance competition. I think that Dancing with the Stars saw an opportunity to use Delvey’s fame to attract more viewership and profit off of her persona. For Delvey’s part, she couldn’t resist an opportunity to be in the spotlight and expand her fame. In many ways, I think that her story shows how the entertainment industry has no regard for the law or crime and sees profit as a top priority. When it comes to more serious crimes than Delvey’s I think that this money mindset could have much more serious consequences. The entertainment industry has the power to shape opinions so let’s hope they use it wisely.
As an avid Dancing With the Stars watcher, I was originally confused to see Anna Delvey on the show; as I do not know of any convicted criminals previously appearing on the show. Personally, I felt that on the show, she was making a mockery out of her charges rather than acknowledging them and presenting responsibility and change. I also felt that she was not even likable on the show. She had a lack of enthusiasm I have never seen a celebrity inhibit on the show before, making it even easier to question her morals and the reason she agreed to dancing in the first place. I truly believe that she only entered the show to appeal to a larger crowd and grow her social media presence, even if it was only for a week. I think that the ethics behind the scenes of choosing which celebrities will participate in this year’s season should come into question. Celebrities and famous people of all different fields come onto the show to try something new, check learning to dance off of their bucket list, or just for fun but through the dancing, their accomplishments are recognized and celebrated. The reason Anna Delvey is well-known should be recognized but not celebrated. The show “Dancing With the Stars” celebrates dance as a form of art and entertainment, showing the public that it is something anyone can do but is also really difficult and intricate, and the show should not be allowing criminals unwilling to grow and learn from their mistakes on the show.