My best friend and I were walking to our dinner reservation in Boston’s Little Italy one evening, when we stumbled upon 6 glass towers that appeared smoky and ominous. My first thought? “No, that can’t possibly be an interpretation of the Holocaust.” Sure enough, the plaque on the wall proved my intuitions to be correct. I turned to my best friend who is half-Jewish, and she was in complete disbelief. We stood there for a few moments in silence, simply observing as people walked from chamber-to-chamber. After seeing her disturbed expression, we walked away in the direction of our reservation. We didn’t have to share any words on it, but to this day I haven’t been able to confirm my feelings toward this site. Was this memorial remembering or romanticizing the horrific events and treatments of the 1940s.
The Holocaust is known to be one of the deadliest and horrific acts of mass murder committed in world history. The brutal genocide of 6 million European Jews at the hand of the Third Reich serves among one of the greatest tragedies of World War II. In Ancient Greek, the term Holocaust means “burnt offering” which can be attributed to the burning of Jewish people in gas chambers. An initiative by the Nazis that started as a mass deportation was converted into a heartless mass murder. European Jews were stripped from their homes and families, forced into packed train cars, and transported to concentration and extermination camps. At these camps, the Jews endured inhumane treatment and horrific living conditions. Most met their fate in the gas chambers where they were burned to their death and disposed of in an attempt to erase Judaism from the Earth. This event left a lasting trauma that continues to provoke conversation in modern society.
The New England Holocaust Memorial was strategically designed to honor various different elements of the Holocaust. There are 6 illuminated glass towers that are filled with a foggy element, replicating the gas of the chambers. The number 6 represents the 6 million Jews that were killed as a result of the Holocaust, the 6 main concentration camps used, and its 6 year duration. Found on the glass chamber walls are numbers representing the tattoos branded on prisoners upon their arrival. These people were identified by numbers rather than names exemplifies the disrespect and inhumane treatment these individuals endured while in the camps. As visitors walk through the exhibit, their skin illuminates with the reflection of the numbers. The experience evokes feelings of being “trapped momentarily in a theater of horror.” Surrounding the exhibit, stumps of the trees that were cleared for the monument remain, standing as another symbol of cruel and unjust murder.
One of the foundational characteristics of a public monument is its ability to be interpreted differently by each of its visitors. Where some may find education and honor, others find discomfort and trauma. When looking at the New England Holocaust Museum through a more positive lens, one can see through attention-grabbing construction and symbols, that it raises awareness of the horrific event. It gives a platform to tell the stories of the victims whose voices were silenced by death. Additionally, the monument contains testimonies from Holocaust survivors describing the conditions and experiences they had at the camps. However, the direct presentation of this memorial brings on a more negative perception from some spectators. To the public eye, this exhibit can seem graphic through the portrayal of gas chambers and claustrophobic elements. Additionally, its placement on a busy street corner leaves little choice for spectators to decide to view the exhibit or not. Some may turn the corner and involuntarily be exposed to the explicit references. This yields complications for parents who must answer their kids’ questions about what they just walked past. After all, how do you tell your child about an extensive, brutal act of mass murder in history?
At the end of the day, it’s almost impossible to create a monument to a historical event without some level of controversial opinions and reactions in its wake. Just as they have in this situation, there will be ongoing debates over whether the memorial is too graphic or not descriptive enough. This plays into the beauty of individual interpretation. While there is no doubt that the Holocaust victims and survivors should be represented, this particular exhibit might not be the most appropriate portrayal for an American city.
Related posts:
Art Theft
Memory Politics in Hungary: Interpreting a Counter-Memorial in Budapest
History’s Most Bitter, Failed Artist
It was all a dream, until it wasn’t: Tupac vs Biggie
The Nazi Art Heist: How the Third Reich Stole Europe’s Cultural Treasures
Can the Artistic Criminal be separated from his artwork?
Murder, Mystery & Makeup
Powered by YARPP.
This article presents an intriguing question as to how the memory of Holocaust victims should be portrayed in addition to the question of how location should be factored into the design elements of a memorial. My initial reaction to the description of the memorial was horror. The inclusion of gas within the 6 towers and the inscription of numbers rather than names upon each monument curates an absolute sense of horror and revulsion. While the curation of this feeling may be the intention of the artist, it is also a valid perspective that the memorial should be kindly reminiscent of those whose lives were lost. Thus invoking the beauty life rather than the anguish of painful death. But, this begs the question of how this memorial seeks to be impactful in terms of remembering the injustices these individuals were killed in the name of.
I thought this article about the Holocaust memorial in New England was very thoughtful. I liked how the article acknowledged the controversy of creating monuments, and how there is always an argument to be made by the public by how controversial it is, or if the memorial isn’t descriptive enough. Having a memorial in a public space in general creates controversy, and acknowledging this while creating an article about a monument in a highly public space is important before delving into criticism. I also like how the article was written from an individual perspective and contrasted how different backgrounds may view this monument. Not only did it acknowledge individual interpretation, but the article also took into consideration how families may view the monument as well. One thing I did find out of place was the last sentence, where it argued that the monument was inappropriate for an American city, however it was the latter statement in a paragraph about how monuments are up to individual interpretation, yet this last sentence felt like an objective statement, not addressing individual interpretation. But overall I turley enjoyed this insightful article!