In the music world, the face of a singer or rapper often becomes the symbol of a song’s success. Fans idolize performers, assuming that powerful lyrics and catchy melodies come directly from their favorite stars’ minds. However, behind many chart-topping tracks is a hidden figure: the ghostwriter. These unseen contributors play a key role in shaping music, yet their presence sparks debates about authorship, authenticity, and whether ghostwriting is just collaboration or something more controversial. A ghostwriter in music is generally defined as someone who writes lyrics, melodies, or even entire songs for an artist who takes credit for the work. While ghostwriting happens in other creative industries like books, it is especially controversial in music. This is because the music industry often markets artists as authentic storytellers with personal narratives. When ghostwriters are involved, fans start to question whether their favorite artist is the real deal or just taking advantage of another person’s talents. This creates an interesting paradox in ghostwriting For example, in hip-hop, an artist’s reputation often depends on their ability to write their own lyrics. Rap battles and diss tracks are seen as personal expressions, so using a ghostwriter can feel like cheating. On the other hand, in pop music, ghostwriting is widely accepted, with teams of writers often collaborating to create hit songs.
To continue, this causes ghostwriting to be an interesting paradox. On one side, it’s undeniably creative as writers produce deeply personal or universally relatable songs that often resonate with millions. But on the other side, when a ghostwriter’s identity is erased, it can feel unfair or even deceptive. This raises ethical questions about the practice, but is ghostwriting really a crime? Some argue that it’s not and they see it as a win-win situation where the ghostwriter gets paid and their work reaches a large audience through the artist’s platform. However, many consider it as stealing since the ghostwriter’s talent goes unrecognized while the artist gets all the fame and credit.
There have been a few examples of ghostwriting scandals in the music industry, especially in hip-hop where authenticity matters. One of the biggest examples was in 2015 when rapper Meek Mill accused Drake of using a ghostwriter. The controversy focused on Quentin Miller, a songwriter who contributed to some of Drake’s tracks including “10 Bands” and “Know Yourself.” While Miller denied being a traditional ghostwriter and that he was more of a collaborator, the incident highlighted the stigma attached to using ghostwriters in hip-hop. This situation caused fans and critics to question Drake’s credibility, even as the songs themselves became undeniable hits.
In pop music, ghostwriting is less of a scandal and more of a business strategy. Artists like Brtiney Spears, Rihanna, and Beyonce have openly worked with writing teams to produce hits that dominate the charts. For example, Rhinna’s “Umberla” was co-written by The-Dream and Christopher “Tricky” Stewart, but it still became a global anthem that defined a summer. Similarly, Beyonce’s “Irreplaceable” was famously written by Ne-Yo, who has discussed how he originally intended the song for himself before Beyonce made it her own. In these cases, the use of ghostwriters is framed as collaboration rather than deception with the primary artist’s performance elevating the material. Still, these examples show how ghostwriters often remain in the shadows while the artist takes center stage as many are completely unaware of the people who actually wrote their favorite songs.
All these examples show that the ghostwriting industry can be seen as both rewarding and exploitative. Successful ghostwriters can make good money, either through royalties or flat fees. But they often give up the rights to their work which leaves them with little claim to the success the song generates. Culturally, ghostwriting challenges the idea of individual genius as fans like to imagine their favorite artists writing lyrics in moments of inspiration, but ghostwriting reveals that writing a song is more of a commercialized process. This can leave fans feeling disappointed or even betrayed when they realize their songs weren’t written by the artist they admire. From a legal standpoint, ghostwriting exists in a gray area. Contracts usually make sure ghostwriters are paid and agree to stay anonymous, but disputes happen when artists don’t pay writers or fail to properly credit them. Sometimes these conflicts become public which exposes the messy reality behind the music industry. Ethically, the biggest issue is transparency. Should artists admit they use ghostwriters? Doing so could normalize the practice and make it less of a secret, however, it might also damage the artist’s reputation and could lead to fans questioning their favorite artist’s talents.
Even with the controversies, ghostwriting has real artistic value. It allows writers to explore different projects and create songs that impact people around the world. For artists, collaborating with ghostwriters can bring fresh ideas and perspectives they might not have on their own which can benefit the music industry as a whole. We see this in many artist’s careers, for instance, Carole King and Gerry Goffin wrote many hits for other artists in the 1960s which shaped the sound of an entire era. Similarly, the work of Max Martin, another prolific ghostwriter, has shaped the careers of stars like Britney Spears, Katy Perry, and Taylor Swift. Overall, ghostwriting in music will always be a complicated subject. On one hand, it helps produce amazing songs that fans love. However, on the other hand, it challenges ideas about authenticity and ownership in the music industry. As music evolves, so will the role of ghostwriters, this will always spark debates about who truly deserves credit for the success of a song. Whether you see ghostwriting as an art, a necessary compromise, or even theft, there is no denying its impact on the music industry and culture.
Hi Pedro!
I found this article informative and interesting, as it expanded on a topic I knew little about. The most interesting part for me was reading about the different opinions of ghostwriting that exist in different genres, whether it helps or hurts the fundamental characteristics of the genre. I think the conversation about ghostwriters is especially relevant in more recent years, as singer-songwriters in mainstream pop music become more popular (i.e. Taylor Swift & Olivia Rodrigo) and consumers become more aware of who’s behind the songs they love. I’ve heard a lot of discourse about co-writers, as many of the pop artists I like typically write their songs with other collaborators and producers. However, this differs from ghostwriting, as you mentioned in your article because collaborators like these are still given writing credits. I was intrigued to read that a lot of ghostwriters do not receive credits for their contributions, only financial compensation. I wonder what drives a songwriter to choose ghostwriting projects over more openly collaborative ones, or if it’s more of a choice made for them by available opportunities.
Hello Pedro,
I liked your article on the role of authenticity in modern music. Drake is a great case study and I wish you went more in depth into his role in the issue, but I think you made a concise summary of the important perspectives. Your article carefully implies where ghostwriters fall in discussions of authenticity, author’s rights, the role of performers and creators, as well as broader issues of credit and reward for artistic achievements. I appreciate your objective take, letting me understand the topic in a variety of ways while still staying broad enough to let me explore them on my own.
Hi Pedro,
After reading the first 2-3 paragraphs of your article I already had so much to say ! I think you covered so many important points on this topic including how ghostwriting is perceived differently with pop music versus rap music and how ghostwriting with music might be different from ghostwriting with novels because fans believe that an artist is expressing their own original thoughts and experiences. You mentioned in your article how when Drake was accused of having a ghostwriter, his songs were still being listened to and hitting the charts. This reminded me of our HONOR 413 class discussion about how cancel culture is extremely temporary because although an individual might be getting hated on or flamed for doing something horrible, their artwork still is being listened to, looked at, and bought. I believe this is what stemmed the idea of separating the art from the artist in situations like this because as consumers who like certain things, it is difficult to say that you don’t like someone’s song just because they had a ghostwriter. It could still be a good and catchy song regardless of who wrote it. Personally, I think that it is disappointing when you learn someone’s song wasn’t actually written about them. However, in regards to cancel culture, I think it is extreme and cruel to ostracize the artist and be rude and mean to them all over the internet. Lastly, I appreciate your point that ghostwriting can be a positive thing because it allows for collaborating with other artists which can spark new ideas and new artwork.